Supermicro M12SWA-TF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemSupermicro M12SWA-TF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro M12SWA-TF
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration76 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
CPU, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1,070
95% 806 Pts
64-Core 5,446
337% 5,446 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Palit(1569 F294) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
224% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 294
Parallax 325
269% 316 fps
MRender 368
Gravity 298
Splatting 199
226% 288 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 224%
Great: 247%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3140 1TB SSD
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS314211
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,355
Write 4,331
Mixed 2,387
682% 3,024 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 93.6
310% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 1,318
951% 1,231 MB/s
Poor: 198% Great: 468%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40DB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 33.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 30.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M12SWA-TF Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO

System: Supermicro M12SWA-TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 180% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback