Asus X99-WS/IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-WS/IPMI  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 03:44
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 723
63% 537 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 91
Parallax 83.8
74% 88.7 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 81
Splatting 72.7
71% 88.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 298 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 212
Write 103
Mixed 103
SusWrite 162
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 21.8
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 57.4
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 109
72% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
798GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 95 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 83.1
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 95.4
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB 28GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 17.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-WS/IPMI Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-WS/IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback