PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20230224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 07 '23 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 216 Seconds |
Run User | CHN-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
99.6%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.3
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 542 494 525 549 552 MB/s
|
174%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
99GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 321 321 321 321 314 MB/s
|
124%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
466GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 77 79 79 78 80 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ABA300V 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 96 95 95 97 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
222GB free
Firmware: V8GNW9G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 129 131 139 129 132 MB/s
|
||||
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CM4X16GD3200C16K2E CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28% | 26% | 23 | 219 | 60 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | BNQ7F76 BenQ EX2780Q |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 56x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 34x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 26x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $291 |