Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Memory 16.5 1-Core 29.9 2-Core 58 19% 34.8 Pts	4-Core 78.3 8-Core 86.4 11% 82.4 Pts	64-Core 94.1 6% 94.1 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0033 00W1143 00W1447IBM 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.3 7.1 8.4 7.7 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 31.9 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 8.4 19% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000NM0033 81Y9807 81Y3867IBM 1TB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 9GB free Firmware: BB5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 3.2 2 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 58.7 Write 9.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 2.1 18% 20 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 4x4GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 347 12% 347 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16