| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star GF75 Thin 9SCXR |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-17F4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200519 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 07 '23 at 03:33 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
62.6%
Good
|
54% 100 Pts
|
50% 363 Pts
|
21% 336 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
MSI(1462 12BE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
24% 33.5 fps
|
35% 43.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown J641GU42J9266NL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66%
Good
|
70% 24.6 GB/s
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
31% 131 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-17F4 Builds (Compare 801 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-17F4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 308x |
| Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples | 273x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 98x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 397x |
| GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples | 178x |
| GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples | 132x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |