TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory38.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 21:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4112
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 138
56% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 324
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 59.3%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 128 139 145 136 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 326
Write 125
Mixed 152
SusWrite 124
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 18.2
89% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 109
93% 135 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 53.6%
 Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
356GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 181 176 186 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 180
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 6x8GB
6 of 6 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 25
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 30.9
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 87.6%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples61x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples28x
GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples92x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples48x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples43x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples24x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples21x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples20x
RAM
M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 231 samples18x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples14x
HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GBHynixBench 94%, 150 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback