Toshiba Qosmio F60

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemToshiba Qosmio F60  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 22:39
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 120
48% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 151
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 1.09
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 48.5
Mixed 34.9
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.25
65% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio F60 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio F60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback