Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 13:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 510
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 65%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 116
Parallax 120
106% 122 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 101 107 102 108 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 288
Write 118
Mixed 154
SusWrite 106
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 23.4
91% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 154
118% 160 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 82%
WD Re 2TB-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 124 128 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 130
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2133C14D4/4G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 23.3
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback