Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 x 65536 colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 20:32
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 117
55% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 253
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 68.1
Write 109
Mixed 97.1
69% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.45
99% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
410GB free
Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 167
Mixed 145
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.23
61% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0N Adata 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback