TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 04:33
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 176
2-Core 347
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,219
114% 950 Pts
64-Core 2,198
136% 2,198 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Asus(1043 04F6)
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 168
Parallax 377
139% 238 fps
MRender 309
Gravity 128
Splatting 200
171% 212 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 140%
 Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 281 298 298 301 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 394
Write 303
Mixed 303
SusWrite 296
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 37.3
144% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 180
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 87.6%
 Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
753GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3261 3265 1827 1601 1591 1602 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 788
Write 3,186
Mixed 888
SusWrite 2191
404% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 98.9
315% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,328
995% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 323%
 Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-4500 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 41.7
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 39.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 138%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples4,674x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples4,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples3,441x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,257x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,475x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,849x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples869x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $59Bench 85%, 346,786 samples731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples648x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback