MSI MS-16GH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP60 2QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16GH  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150312
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 02:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 14.1
1-Core 77
2-Core 131
37% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 285
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1113) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 4.4
2% 8.03 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 167 88 59 115 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 424
Write 199
Mixed 321
SusWrite 115
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 27.5
98% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 27.1
74% 159 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 103%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
594GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 133 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 110
Write 99.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 134
66% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 367
11% 367 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GH Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback