Intel HM570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel HM570  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 21:32
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 62.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
89% 171 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 872
87% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 135
Parallax 229
94% 160 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 121
Splatting 192
146% 177 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN3.0 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
595GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06815 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1740 979 825 932 660 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1376
Write 1863
Mixed 1,266
SusWrite 949
308% 1,364 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 44.8
154% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 1,413
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 763
690% 1060 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 214%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA47UH-MEC1U22T3 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM570 Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel HM570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback