Lenovo 10AS0032UK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AS0032UK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 266
39% 286 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Dell(1028 2120) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 12.8
6% 10.3 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 362
Mixed 115
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 26.6
106% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 109
75% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
229GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 111 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 109
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AS0032UK Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AS0032UK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback