Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 18:43
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 187
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 469
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 20.1
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 18.7
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN3147
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 358 296 29 28 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 466
Write 402
Mixed 344
SusWrite 179
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 37.6
135% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 147
125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 93%
Rogueware 2.5" SATA NX100S 1TB
840GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 384 371 403 414 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 417
Write 445
Mixed 401
SusWrite 392
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 32.9
120% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 187
148% 201 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 9905584-037.A00LF 8GB
1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2 Builds (Compare 3,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2 - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback