TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A35
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 841
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,248
77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 87.3%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
MSI(1462 5132)
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
236% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 354
Parallax 429
269% 371 fps
MRender 512
Gravity 312
Splatting 226
272% 350 fps
Poor: 208% ↑
This bench: 236%
 Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2114 2143 2018 1512 1516 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,505
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 1,906
478% 2,125 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 79.7
260% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 959
706% 931 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑
This bench: 338%
 Great: 399%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
81GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 939 866 865 869 861 358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1506
Write 1,194
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 793
264% 1,178 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 74.9
250% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1,000
754% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑
This bench: 232%
 Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3466 MHz clocked @ 1733 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 37.3
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 125%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples12x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples9x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD  $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples6x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples11x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples5x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples3x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples4x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples3x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL  $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback