Asus Z10PA-U8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z10PA-U8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-U8 Series
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 3.87
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 116
27% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 287
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 456GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 33 23 33 20 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64% Good
Read 195
Write 66.3
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 26
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 3.4
619% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64%
Great: 223%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 62 36 40 23 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 164
Write 28.3
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 43.4
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 465
9% 465 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PA-U8 Series Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Asus Z10PA-U8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback