Gigabyte GA-B560M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M H  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 258
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 900
83% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 214
Parallax 210
199% 222 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 156
Splatting 126
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 340 402 98 189 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 474
Write 412
Mixed 375
SusWrite 233
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 22.8
100% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 43.8
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1833WH.003 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M H Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback