Monster ABRA A7 V11.4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V11.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V11.4
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 7.91
1-Core 155
2-Core 298
71% 153 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 910
92% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Device(1D05 1140) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7155
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.3% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 69.4
66% 84.3 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 59.3
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 819
Write 557
Mixed 632
148% 669 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 49.1
168% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 419
291% 368 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 11
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 4.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 424
9% 424 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V11.4 Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V11.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback