Acer TravelMate P643-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P643-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P643-M
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 66
2-Core 121
53% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 168
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Acer(1025 0683) 1GB
CLim: 708 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 6
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0683) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 39 52 45 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 368
Write 117
Mixed 173
SusWrite 48.7
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 15.8
34% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 48.1
DQ Write 29.8
DQ Mixed 16.8
18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P643-M Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P643-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback