Asrock X570 AQUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 254%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive538% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 AQUA  (all builds)
Memory33.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 179
2-Core 357
108% 206 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1278
119% 989 Pts
64-Core 2,780
172% 2,780 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Asus(1043 8830) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Lighting 304
Reflection 262
Parallax 308
247% 291 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 248
Splatting 181
198% 253 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 205%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4216 4465 4220 4766 4751 4709 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
538% Outstanding
Read 2,446
Write 4,477
Mixed 2,987
SusWrite 4,521
822% 3,608 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 109
347% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,263
940% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 538%
Great: 633%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30.8
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 31.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 AQUA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 AQUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback