| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180820 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '23 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.9%
Good
|
63% 110 Pts
|
49% 401 Pts
|
31% 497 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
32% 38.3 fps
|
19% 26.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
82% 368 MB/s
|
118% 41.1 MB/s
|
163% 264 MB/s
| |
|
|
101% 139 MB/s
|
146% 1.17 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
88% 30.9 GB/s
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,159 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,471x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,314x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,012x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 958x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 746x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 658x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $342 |