ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81SX

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 81SX (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '23 at 17:32
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 125 2-Core 245 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 749 76% 617 Pts	64-Core 945 58% 945 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Legend(17AA 3FFC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3076 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Lighting 87.7 Reflection 95.9 Parallax 82.5 72% 88.7 fps	MRender 95 Gravity 84.7 Splatting 78.2 70% 86 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L3A0B 256GB 4,440 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80030C10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 358 360 358 544 357 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 757 Write 292 Mixed 494 SusWrite 422 109% 491 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 43.7 186% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 533 DQ Write 649 DQ Mixed 444 376% 542 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 172%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 18GB free Firmware: X41100RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 456 Write 416 Mixed 336 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 32 107% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 242 201% 292 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 23.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 25.4 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 81SX Builds (Compare 5,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Lenovo 81SX

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	2,848x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1,213x
Core i5-9300HFIntelBench 73%, 6,965 samples	687x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	2,533x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	2,126x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	368x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 156%, 10,396 samples	860x
MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBMicronBench 165%, 3,817 samples	423x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples	407x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	1,021x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	695x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 76%, 8,736 samples	614x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback