HP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8836
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 94
2-Core 205
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 313
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 8836) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.42.09
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.17 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 403 415 428 433 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 438
Write 295
Mixed 348
SusWrite 417
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 17.3
61% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 162
162% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback