Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160911
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 10:21
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 643
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,246
77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 C72B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 148
Parallax 149
122% 149 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 126
Splatting 113
112% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850 H 1TB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,304
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,941
478% 2,141 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 59.1
198% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 442
330% 439 MB/s
Poor: 295% Great: 490%
WD Game Drive 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 123
Write 105
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 111
139% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
295% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 55.3
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 40.3
131% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 114%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback