Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 00:44
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 93.7
37% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 153
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Asus(1043 8526) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 190 218 208 229 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 334
Write 258
Mixed 243
SusWrite 215
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 23.5
71% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 154
131% 191 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
318GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 89.8
Write 93.2
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 78.1
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
174GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 115 115 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 114
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 67%
Mass Storage Device 125GB
0GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.1
Write 17.6
Mixed 16.7
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.8
125% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G16002 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.9
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback