RM ONE 300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM ONE 300  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 309
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
EVGA(3842 2650) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.4
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 10.5
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001C81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 175 188 183 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 147
Write 180
Mixed 156
SusWrite 175
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 23.1
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 47.4
DQ Mixed 27.5
23% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 106 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 107
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 25664T160K SAM Elpida EBJ20EF8BDWA-GN-F M378B5273CH0-CH9 HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE 300 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback