Intel NUC10i5FNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC10i5FNK
MotherboardIntel NUC10i5FNB  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 546
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000
Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 200
Parallax 233
162% 210 fps
MRender 225
Gravity 172
Splatting 163
150% 187 fps
Poor: 154%
This bench: 147%
Great: 172%
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2081) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 153
Parallax 7.3
5% 55.7 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$39
80GB free (System drive), PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 297 318 285 296 298 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-027.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC10i5FNB Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC10i5FNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback