Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$464
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 227
2-Core 459
133% 258 Pts
4-Core 917
8-Core 1,710
157% 1,314 Pts
64-Core 4,290
266% 4,290 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 131%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.68
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 621
Reflection 594
Parallax 734
506% 650 fps
Gravity 580
Splatting 315
378% 447 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2002 1500 1558 1140 1126 1091 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1527
Write 3579
Mixed 2,886
SusWrite 1,403
535% 2,349 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 85.6
293% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,467
DQ Write 1,231
DQ Mixed 1,386
1,028% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 297%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
656GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3377 3356 3369 3380 3170 1345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
447% Outstanding
Read 2441
Write 2,962
Mixed 2,615
SusWrite 3,000
624% 2,754 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 97.5
324% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,611
DQ Write 1,344
DQ Mixed 1,499
1,117% 1485 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 447%
Great: 526%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
1TB free
Firmware: EGFM13.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3652 3716 3760 3798 3787 3808 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 2,808
Mixed 2011
SusWrite 3,753
586% 2,573 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 71.8
270% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,711
DQ Write 1,686
DQ Mixed 1,794
1,321% 1,730 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 456%
Great: 496%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
824GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1750 1763 1749 1738 1760 1760 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 1,545
Mixed 908
SusWrite 1,753
356% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 69.6
247% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 1,322
DQ Mixed 1,267
1,000% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 334%
Great: 363%
Lacie 2big Dock Thunderbolt 3 Raid 0 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 246 245 244 246 243 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 206
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 244
135% 185 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 3.6
693% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 128%
Great: 210%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
3TB free
Firmware: MKAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 108 107 112 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 83.9
Write 105
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 109
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$198
8TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 197 199 200 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
206% Outstanding
MC Read 82
MC Write 83.7
MC Mixed 78.6
233% 81.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 53.6
SC Mixed 37.2
109% 38.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 206%
Great: 257%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback