Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700 25,535 User benchmarks, average bench 108% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 64.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 248 76% 143 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 969 87% 732 Pts	64-Core 1,383 86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 115%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770 19,750 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 10.2 7% 10.9 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 0.2 6% 7.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 2280-512GB SSD 512GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2704M SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 440 435 418 394 420 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 457 Write 457 Mixed 268 SusWrite 422 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 13.3 104% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 15.7 67% 147 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	491x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	482x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	461x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,370x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16