TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hasee GK5S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHasee GK5S  (all builds)
MotherboardHasee GK7CP6R
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 668
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 83.8%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.4% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 77.5
66% 82.9 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 70.3
65% 80.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 65.4%
 Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 149 57 131 54 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 430
Write 318
Mixed 331
SusWrite 114
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 24.3
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 191
166% 245 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 63.2%
 Great: 85%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
180GB free
Firmware: EXF7102Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 858 795 760 726 697 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 1,942
Mixed 1,276
SusWrite 818
298% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 46.4
148% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 514
381% 506 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 168%
 Great: 296%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
384GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 115 118 112 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 115
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 66.3%
 Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16S4/16G 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GK5S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Hasee GK5S

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples2x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples1x
GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples3x
SSD
RBUSNS8180S3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 67%, 534 samples1x
XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdataBench 193%, 12,045 samples1x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples1x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GBKingstonBench 87%, 591 samples1x
KF2666C16S4/16G 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 24GBKingstonBench 46%, 1 sample1x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback