Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1402ZA
Memory13.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 21:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 318
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 749
79% 633 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1E72) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 14
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 7.3
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme FORESEE P709F128G 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0527B0P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 58 26 49 109 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,118
Write 400
Mixed 517
SusWrite 80
116% 529 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 32
176% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 255
192% 255 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 113%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2 Kingston 9905744-108.A00G 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1402ZA_F1402ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback