Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 856
82% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 73.4
49% 46.7 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 42.5
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42G1TBKA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,714
Write 1,180
Mixed 1,252
375% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 79.9
278% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 397
370% 571 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 277%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
466GB free
Firmware: SBFM6H.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 408 283 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 438
Mixed 348
SusWrite 235
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 46.7
171% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 242
208% 304 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
103GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 110 108 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 106
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 108
59% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 115 127 120 113 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 106
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 118
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
806GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 169 170 169 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 137
Mixed 120
SusWrite 170
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
ST1000LM048-2E71 1TB
931GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 39.4
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 38.7
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FF Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2F1 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback