HP OMEN Pro 15 Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN Pro 15 Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8104
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 137
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 280
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
HP(103C 8104) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.8
5% 7 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 552 537 563 538 538 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 625
Write 591
Mixed 431
SusWrite 542
123% 547 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 28.2
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 247
194% 269 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Pro 15 Notebook Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN Pro 15 Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback