Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W510  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 422
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.4 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.3
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 160 72 71 70 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 243
Write 240
Mixed 217
SusWrite 108
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 33.1
121% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 154
127% 182 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W510 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback