Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$360
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 197
2-Core 371
119% 222 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1,291
120% 1002 Pts
64-Core 1,737
108% 1,737 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 145
Parallax 243
108% 174 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 152
Splatting 96.7
98% 123 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,102
Write 553
Mixed 552
162% 736 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 48.9
226% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 553
467% 690 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 296%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3164 3186 3180 3055 3172 3169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 3,081
Mixed 2,918
SusWrite 3,154
668% 2,951 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 80.4
291% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,809
DQ Write 1,633
DQ Mixed 1,721
1,291% 1,721 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 464%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
201% Outstanding
MC Read 78.6
MC Write 67.4
MC Mixed 74.4
210% 73.5 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 66.4
SC Mixed 62.8
174% 60.9 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 201%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback