Supermicro X11DAC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X11DAC  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DAC
Memory245.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 00:17
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 209
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 792
71% 602 Pts
64-Core 3961
245% 3961 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 100
Parallax 146
73% 112 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 71.2
69% 86.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 1354 1384 1270 863 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 1494
Mixed 1,061
SusWrite 1053
284% 1,261 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 55.3
182% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 268
281% 465 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 203%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 68.1
MC Mixed 42.4
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 118%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11DAC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X11DAC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback