Alienware 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAlienware 17  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 068R5X
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 25.8
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 39.8
18% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 69.2
8-Core 95.3
10% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 97.5
6% 97.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 0.9
0% 3.4 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 211 203 180 169 149 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 344
Write 312
Mixed 267
SusWrite 183
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 12.8
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 55.8
50% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 125%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
223GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 256 252 232 299 363 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 268
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 5.4
22% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 69.4
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 80.2
59% 77 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1777 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 3.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback