Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 15:36
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2170B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 200
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 799
68% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,663
103% 1,663 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Apple(106B 017C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.30.44.17
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 63
Parallax 174
86% 114 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 117
Splatting 61.9
67% 84.6 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1290
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,264
Write 1,572
Mixed 1,112
295% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 46.6
159% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 438
332% 457 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-WM 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
144% Outstanding
MC Read 66.9
MC Write 58.2
MC Mixed 52.3
169% 59.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 144%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback