HP ProLiant DL320e Gen8 v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant DL320e Gen8 v2  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 28 '23 at 10:28
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 106
34% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 169
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 38 36 40 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 101
Write 50.7
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 38.7
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 669238-071 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 930
4% 930 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 64 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback