Lenovo 20X8S04J00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20X8S04J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20X8S04J00
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 116
46% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 285
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 5091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.44.40
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.9
4% 8.17 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 12
9% 11 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41730C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 957 652 408 443 425 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,145
Write 1,010
Mixed 843
SusWrite 553
199% 888 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 42.9
144% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 448
317% 408 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 141%
Great: 312%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-118.A00G Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20X8S04J00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20X8S04J00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback