Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 632
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 1,251
77% 1,251 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 34.9
30% 36.8 fps
MRender 47.5
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,604
Write 2,283
Mixed 2,729
636% 2,872 MB/s
4K Read 145
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 44.2
296% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 176
145% 214 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
931GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 407
Mixed 396
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 166
136% 201 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
924GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 340
Write 294
Mixed 301
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 25.5
86% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 155
119% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
577GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 339
Write 296
Mixed 300
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 25.4
86% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 155
119% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion HDD 10TB
2TB free, PID 2038
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 162
Mixed 149
204% 160 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.2
345% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 31.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback