MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 14:47
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 835
86% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 170
64% 114 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 70
Splatting 33.7
55% 72.1 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S660 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07443
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 714 719 720 721 719 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 743
Mixed 739
SusWrite 719
168% 747 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 63.2
206% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 1,041
718% 888 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 176%
Great: 406%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback