Aleksey O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Aleksey O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 464 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3415) CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.02 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.3% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 60.6 Parallax 65.4 34% 55.8 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 43.6 41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pcie NVME 512G 512GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 170% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3.0412 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 322 172 188 272 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1,244 Write 1,651 Mixed 1,252 SusWrite 330 252% 1,119 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 47.7 155% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 415 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 361 264% 349 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 216%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 4GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 148 Write 65.1 Mixed 67.3 104% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.6 153% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 38.9 MC Mixed 34.9 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical O.E.M. Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Aleksey O.E.M.

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2696 v2IntelBench 70%, 376 samples	4x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
RX 5600-XTAMD $300Bench 83%, 112,731 samples	3x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GBBench 147%, 284 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- 16GBSamsungBench 94%, 33 samples	10x
M391B1G73BH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 50%, 37 samples	4x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16