Asus Z11PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z11PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z11PA-D8 Series
Memory123 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 80
2-Core 175
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 610
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 1,994
123% 1,994 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 182
Parallax 157
136% 169 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 129
Splatting 128
114% 142 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKA512G7 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF119D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 434 128 263 220 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 732
Write 501
Mixed 598
SusWrite 288
118% 530 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 28.8
108% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 469
361% 490 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 102%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ATP X4B16QB4BLTDSO-E-BC1 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 31.7
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z11PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

System: Asus Z11PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback