Notebook W65_67SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemNotebook W65_67SC  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SC
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 00:55
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 95.4
49% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 168
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6505) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 8.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 5.2
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SFAT128G1122 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 124 139 159 143 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 374
Write 141
Mixed 153
SusWrite 147
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 9.1
50% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 75.4
74% 119 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 69%
Kingbank KP330 120GB
48GB free
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 67 73 76 72 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 348
Write 264
Mixed 223
SusWrite 96.9
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7
39% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 0515 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback