Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 354
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,193
112% 929 Pts
64-Core 1,532
95% 1,532 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2254 2235 1954 1738 1664 1628 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,045
Write 2253
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 1,912
439% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 47.6
242% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 612
562% 847 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 313%
Great: 352%
Asgard AN3.0 512GNVMe-M.2/80 512GB
407GB free
Firmware: SN06815 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2157 2078 1863 600 618 687 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 2,310
Mixed 1,759
SusWrite 1,334
402% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 84.9
286% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,080
798% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 284%
Great: 307%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
726GB free
Firmware: DEMA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 104 99 97 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA47UG-MEC1U2AV5 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 29.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback