Medion E15415

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E15415  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NP1xCM
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220520
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 192
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 477
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A993) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-256G-PHISON-SSD-B47R 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 240 226 182 228 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,205
SusWrite 250
253% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 65.1
240% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 154
235% 454 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 175%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15415 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15415

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback