Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD4  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 5.9 GHz, turbo 6.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 480
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2777) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.8% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 63.2
39% 49.4 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 25.8
29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 466
Mixed 403
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 49.6
158% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 285
236% 338 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
Lexar microSD RDR 64GB
59GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29
Write 20.8
Mixed 22
29% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
132% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD4 Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback