Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 12:56
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 160
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 553
50% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 55.2
27% 48.1 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 40.9
38% 47 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sm951 NVMe SAMSUNG 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW75D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 944 957 954 954 940 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,405
Write 1,113
Mixed 763
SusWrite 956
237% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 40.2
131% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 344
248% 322 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 169%
Great: 260%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 94 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 98.5
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 97 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 32.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 100
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 123
Write 65.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 81.6
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 143%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 201 201 203 202 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 213
Mixed 100
SusWrite 202
133% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
272% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 203 205 207 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 205
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 205
131% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
264% 2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 120%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 36
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback