HP h8-1534

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	HP h8-1534 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 2AC8
Memory	8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '23 at 10:15
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 114 52% 83.7 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 252 29% 225 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.5% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 56.4 50% 59.8 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 61.3 Splatting 55.5 49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 904GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 326 378 397 381 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 429 Write 362 Mixed 346 SusWrite 366 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 33.1 112% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 158 120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 125%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 832 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 02a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22 Write 4.2 Mixed 5.7 10% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 10GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1534 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1534

CPU
FX-6200 Six-CoreAMD $40Bench 58%, 5,908 samples	20x
FX-6350 Six-CoreAMD $100Bench 59%, 29,222 samples	7x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	9x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
870 EVO 500G 500GBSamsungBench 88%, 499 samples	2x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 10GBNanyaBench 40%, 68 samples	6x
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 10GBRamaxelBench 38%, 22 samples	2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 10GBMicronBench 43%, 21 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $71

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16